Table 5.8 – Shannon Diversity Index Value of
Species with Conservation Importance
|
Shannon Diversity
Index Value of Species with Conservation Importance |
||||
|
Point
Count Method |
|
|
|
|
|
EIA
Report ID |
EM&A
Manual ID |
December-16 |
December-22 |
Remarks |
|
P1 |
FLW1 |
0 |
0.78 |
+ |
|
P2 |
FLW2 |
0.19 |
1.33 |
+ |
|
P3 |
FLW3 |
** |
** |
= |
|
P4 |
FLW4 |
0.99 |
0.80 |
- |
|
P5 |
FLW5 |
0.44 |
0.98 |
+ |
|
P6 |
FLW6 |
1.10 |
0.77 |
- |
|
P7 |
FLW7 |
0.41 |
0.96 |
+ |
|
P9 |
SP/NSW3 |
1.91 |
2.02 |
+ |
|
P10 |
SP/NSW2 |
1.99 |
1.46 |
- |
|
P11 |
NSW1 |
0.30 |
0 |
- |
|
P12 |
SP/NSW1 |
2.16 |
1.24 |
- |
|
Overall H’ |
2.04 |
1.82 |
- |
|
|
Species Richness |
18 |
12 |
- |
|
|
|
||||
|
Transect Walk Method |
|
|
|
|
|
EIA Report ID |
EM&A Manual ID |
December-16 |
December-22 |
Remarks |
|
Fung Lok Wai |
FLW |
1.12 |
0.79 |
- |
|
Nam Sang Wai |
NSW |
0.64 |
0.50 |
- |
|
YLIE-CW |
YLIE-CW |
** |
1.31 |
+ |
|
Overall H’ |
1.39 |
1.11 |
- |
|
|
Species Richness |
5 |
6 |
+ |
|
|
Notes: ** result when no species recorded; 0
computation result from only one recorded species; +
increased Shannon diversity index (H’); - decreased Shannon diversity index (H’); = similar Shannon
diversity index (H’) |
||||